Posts tagged NZ Herlad

Capital Gains Tax – the numbers

12

I think someone got the numbers MAJORLY wrong on this story. Today it was leaked (probably by the Labour Party) that Labour will introduce a Capital Gains tax policy as part of its election campaign sometime next week, as reported in the NZ Herald.

While all speculation at present, the details appear to be:

  • a 15% capital gain tax
  • excludes the family home
  • excludes property purchased prior to when it is introduced (so around 2012) (this has to be the case, since Govt’s cant pass retrospective laws).

The article reports it will raise around 4 billion.  I think that’s wrong, and here’s why:

  • The tax workging group sais a FULL capital gains tax, on ALL property at the marginal tax rate of 33% would raise around 9 billion (around 2007/8) (they admit this is a very rough figure).
  • It’s estimated that around 15% of property is investment property (ie not the family home).  So 15% of 9 billion = 1.35 billion
  • At a marginal tax rate of 15% this would raise $613 million

Now many of these figures are rough.  Many will even be wrong, but my point is that its VERY hard to raise any large amount from this tax without making either the tax equal to the marginal tax rate (ie 33%) and/or putting it on the family home too – a sure vote killer.

In addition this tax only raises money when property prices are rising.  At present they aren’t ( by any large factor).  So the value from this tax in 2012 might be closer to zero.  In 2013 I would doubt it would raise $100 million.  This si going to create issues for Labour, since none of this helps with paying for their billion of dollars of already announced policies (remember GST off fruit and veges which will cost almost a 1/4 billion alone?)

Now I would also add that I am in favour of some sort of capital profits tax, but not of this sort.  Its too watered down to be effective, and too forced on “tax the rich” to actually do anything other than piss a bunch of people off.

Of course that last point isn’t a worry for Labour – they have so few supporters at the moment they need bold initiatives like this to give it a go.

Black and White Version: Capital gains taxes aren’t all bad – but the one proposed by Labour just wont work, because it wont raise much money.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon


Drinking age doesnt exisit

2

The New Zealand media really don’t get it about the drinking age in NZ – there isn’t one!  There is only a purchase age.

The headline today in the NZ Herald Big majority for drinking age of 20 shows me they only care about headlines, since the entire article contradicts this headline.

The first paragraph says:

An overwhelming majority of people support raising the legal purchase age for alcohol to 20

It goes on to explain the question asked:

When asked by the pollsters to choose between three options for the minimum age to buy alcohol,…

The Herald even have a pool asking the wrong question Should the Drinking Age be raised (my answer would be: Shouldn’t we start by HAVING a drinking age, coz we dont have one!)

So it’s clear the person writing the story KNEW that it was a question about purchase age, but but just decided to make up a misleading headline about drinking age anyway (either that or he’s lazy, or stupid, or possibly all three).

Black and White Version: Headlines in newspapers are sensationalist WAY to often.  Being factually wrong is the worst kind.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon


Go to Top