Christchurch City Council’s Draft Development Plan
Yesterday the Christchurch City Council released its draft plan for the development of Christchurch post the recent earthquakes.
If you click on the link above you will get an online flip page style book, or if you prefer something you can download, here’s the pdf version of the CCC plan.
Let’s cut to the chase here:
This document ROCKS! (and not in a bad, earthquake way, excuse the unintended pun). I strongly recommend any Christchurch resident reads it and gives feedback.
IMHO, it’s the right balance of vision (it gives us all something to think/look forward to) with some practical now stuff.
To balance off my praise for the CCC, I give a HUGE brick bat to Gerry Brownlee, who has been the ONLY poor performer out of ALL the agencies and people involved in the earthquake recovery:
- CCC have done a good job (and a great job on this plan)
- EQC an average job (too slow, but OK)
- The Government have done a good job (with a very fair compensation package to red zoners who can’t rebuild). Key, in particular, has come across as very reasonable and level headed.
- CERA have done a good job – getting the right CE was probably half of that!
But Browlee has performed poorly. Why? Because less than one week prior to announce the compensation packages for homeowners that were not able to rebuild their homes, he arrogantly refused to give ANY idea of when info would come out on it. Instead of saying I can not confirm an exact date, but we hope to have information out to those effected in a matter of weeks, not months. But no, he just said I know, but I am not telling you, it’s complex. (Note: I have paraphrased here, he didn’t say these exact words) Can you say Arrogant Prick any louder, Gerry?
However, Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee called the plan “a pretty big wish list”.
Gee, thanks Gerry, that was constructive! (in case you missed it, that was me being sarcastic).
Contrast this with how Key responded:
Prime Minister John Key is a fan of light rail for earthquake-hit Christchurch but he’s less clear on who should pay for the city’s $2 billion rebuild plan.
To to a degree, both are right, coz they say the same message, but in totally different ways. There’s a lot not costed in the plan. The CCC says about half will be paid for by the Council (ie ratepayers) and half by a mix of Government and private investment. So yes, the issue of where the money comes from needs to be answered at some stage. But notice how Key’s message is Yes, but … and Gerry says No, unless … even though they have a similar message of who’s gonna pay?. Gerry you could learn so much from your leader!
Anyway, back to the plan, it rocks, read it and give feedback.
Black and White Version: The CCC have the right mix of vision and practicality in their latest plan. The challenge will be funding it, but now is the best time to try for things like this.
- Media writing stories about nothing (well more earthquakes).
- Christchurch earthquake – the media are leeches.
- Misleading Press, and scaremongering Labour MP
- My take on Ken Ring, John Campbell, tax increases, portaloos and all things earthquake
- Christchurch Earthquake – what can I do?
- Christchurch earthquake – 5 days on – the small stuff
- Christchurch Earthquake – part II
- New earthquake scale to replace richter in Christchurch
- Don’t vote for Jim, and here’s why (he breaks the law)
- New Earthquake office game in Christchurch